Announcements for
June 28, 2006  
from G. Edward Griffin

You are receiving this email because you previously contacted Reality Zone or Freedom Force and requested our announcements and updates. If you no longer wish to receive them, you may unsubscribe below.

Audio Archives
of The Reality Zone
A series of dynamic recordings on freedom, monetary, and health issues, dramatic events in history, and true-life adventures. They are produced by G. Edward Griffin and taken from his private collection. Each volume contains three CDs (or optional cassette tapes). (More)

Question Authority; How to Survive Germ Warfare, Pandemics, Medications, and Vaccines
By James P. Hilton
If you are wondering why an increasing number of people are questioning the authority of their doctors, dentists, and government officials, here is the answer. The data and wisdom from a hundred sources have been condensed into just one book. (More)

The Real Lincoln; His Agenda and an Unnecessary War
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
This is one of the most fascinating myth-busting biographies you will ever read. For too long, the world has suffered under the illusion that Lincoln abolished slavery. Discover in his own words that he was a racist who used the slavery issue to popularize his political agenda, which was to convert the US from a union of independent states into a centralized federal government with unlimited power. His creed was collectivism. (More)

The Science and Politics of Cancer
A discourse by G. Edward Griffin
In this video, G. Edward Griffin, author of World without Cancer; The Story of Vitamin B17, and founder of the Cancer Cure Foundation, addresses the following topics:

® Two opposed views of cancer.
® Pancreatic enzymes and food factors in the control of cancer.
® How the pharmaceutical cartel captured the medical profession.
® Why Sloan Kettering falsified research to discredit Laetrile.
® Is there a conspiracy to withhold a control for cancer? (More)

Click here to visit our online bookstore to browse over 100 other items of interest.

MEET BILL STILL, FIAT-MONEY ADVOCATE
Those of you who have seen the video documentary, The Money Masters, written and produced by Bill Still, will be surprised to know that Mr. Still is a strong advocate of fiat money, and you may have missed that message in his video. In any event, anyone interested in the concept of false leadership and non-solutions should find my analysis of his works worth reading. This is this link: Meet Bill Still.

IS BUILDING SEVEN THE SMOKING GUN OF 9/11?
Many subscribers have asked my opinion of the possibility that, on 9/11, the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition. My view is that all the evidence points in that direction, but I have been reluctant to dwell on the issue because it can get people sidetracked from other issues about which there can be no question – such as the fact that CFR controllers of the Bush Administration had ample foreknowledge of the attacks but decided to allow them. One really doesn't need to go any further than that to understand that the entire War on Terrorism is a ploy for hidden agendas, so why must we look for areas to discuss where the evidence is merely circumstantial?

That is still my attitude, but it occurred to me several months ago that the evidence for a controlled demolition of the Twin Towers is far more than circumstantial. It may not be "proof" for those who will accept nothing short of written confessions from the perpetrators, but is a significant factor to consider nevertheless.

There is no such thing as absolute proof. There is only evidence. Proof may be defined as sufficient evidence to convince the observer that a particular hypothesis is true. The same evidence that is sufficient to convince one person may be insufficient for another. The case may be proved to the first but not to the second who still needs more evidence. It is in the spirit of this reality that I offer the following evidence.

SILVERSTEIN SAYS THE BUILDING WAS PULLED
Larry Silverstein, the owner of The Twin Towers and Building 7, said on a PBS TV documentary entitled America Rebuilds, broadcast in September 2002, that he and others made a decision to "pull" Building 7 because of fires on two of its floors. He didn't say who the others were, but it was assumed to be the New York Fire Department. The term "pull" is commonly used in the building industry to mean a controlled demolition. His exact words were: “I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it; and they made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse.”

This was the genesis of a thousand articles and blogs suggesting that Silverstein had deliberately destroyed his own buildings for the purpose of collecting insurance on them which, reportedly, was about two times their actual value.

2 YEARS LATER, HE CHANGED HIS STORY
Two years later, after his statement had come under scrutiny and the full implications began to emerge, Silverstein claimed that, when he said “pull” he was only talking about pulling the firefighters out of the building!

It is tempting to just laugh at this statement thinking that no one could take it seriously. However, a review of the Internet shows that there are, indeed, many commentators who are content to accept his revised explanation. So, let us briefly analyze. The fires in Building 7 were relatively small and were limited to two locations. All occupants of the building had been evacuated and, at no time was there any reason to think that the fires would cause additional loss of life – and at no time were the fires considered to be a threat to the structural integrity of Building 7.

In view of all these facts, I believe it is far more logical to believe that Silverstein was talking about pulling the building rather than the fire fighters. Watch the video and listen carefully to the inflection of his voice as he ties together the phrase: “they made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse.” There can be no doubt that the two events are tied together just as the words are: the decision to pull and the collapse of the building. Notice, also, that there is no indication of surprise when he mentions the collapse. If he had not anticipated the collapse, one would expect him to say something like: "It's a good thing we made the decision to get those fire fighters out of there, because, much to our surprise, the building collapse just a short time afterward." But he did not say anything like that. He simply said, as in one continuous thought: "They made the decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse." Watch the video here and judge for yourself: Silverstein on PBS

THE FASTEST BUILDING DEMOLITION IN HISTORY
If you still think that Silverstein was referring to fire fighters, there is no point in reading any further. You will not consider what follows to be of any significance. However, if your judgment plus the manner in which Building 7 collapsed lead to you believe that it was brought down by controlled demolition, then what follows may be of interest.

It takes many weeks of planning and preparation by a team of highly trained experts to bring down a structure the size of Building 7. The first step is to locate a qualified organization. Their number is small, and it is not likely that the New York Fire Department is one of them. After negotiating a contract, the engineers have to obtain master blueprints and identify the main structural components. They must analyze the building materials, the thickness of load-bearing beams, the weight that rests upon them, the space between them, where the access points are to place charges, how intense the charges must be, in what timing sequence they must be ignited. A computerized firing system must be programmed to deliver the precisely timed firing impulses. Then the charges must be obtained from a storage depot in a remote location away from urban areas. Technicians must gain access to the beams and, in many cases, hack their way through walls to get to them. Safety procedures are followed to insure that all technicians are clear of the area before implosion is triggered.

This is just a sampling of what must be done before a building like Number 7 can be pulled, and it normally takes many weeks or even months to do it. Yet, the elapsed time between Mr. Silverstein's decision to “pull” the building and the final collapse was 45 minutes!

What more do we need to know? For many of us, the evidence is comprised of so many components and, in its entirety, is so convincing that we consider it to be nothing less than proof. The concept that the destruction of the World Trade Center was an inside job is absurd. But the story advanced by the government and Larry Silverman is even more so. To explain the manner in which the building collapsed - or that the building collapsed at all - plus the rapid execution of the demolition, all lead to the conclusion that explosives had to have been planted inside Building 7 before 9/11. And, if they were planted in Building 7, for whatever reason, it would have been the same reason to plant them in the Twin Towers.

Those who believe that government officials are telling the whole truth about 9/11 will not be convinced by this reasoning - or perhaps any other. For them, it is a matter of faith and, somehow, mixed up with "love of country." To question their leaders is, to them, unpatriotic. For those who believe that government officials are covering up the truth about 9/11, this will be only one more piece of evidence that strengthens their conviction.