YOUR AD OR STATEMENT HERE?
(Click for rates)
Aug 13-15, Oklahoma City Ed Griffin speaks at Freedom 21
Conference on how to stop home-grown tyranny.
Contact Tom DeWeese at 540-341-8911.
Continental Congress 2009.
A national coalition of leaders in the freedom movement will meet to
determine a unified action program to restore the American Republic.
Date and location to be announced. Contact
We the People.
Send us information about upcoming events
and we will post it here free. Should be under 35 words. Activities
must be consistent with
The Creed of Freedom and
The Code of Conduct. Send to
2009 JULY 11 – JULY 17
Click on headlines to see full
indicates article worth printing for future reference.
If original sources are missing, click on Cached.
Camera indicates video or slideshow.
Speaker indicates audio.
Asterisk indicates an amazing event or phenomenon.
(See them all together
US: Federal judge rules that FBI does not have to
answer question in law suits relating to 9/11 attack. After all these years,
the government still is protecting its secrets about that day.
AZCentral 2009 July 16 (Cached)
US: Proposed federal healthcare bill would make
individual private insurance illegal. Collectivism does not like free
Freedom Works 2009 July 16 (Cached)
US: Federal judge dismisses soldier's suit challenging
legitimacy of Obama's presidency because, a few days ago, his deployment
orders to Afghanistan were revoked. Makes no sense but that was the ruling.
Ledger Enquirer 2009 July 16 (Cached)
UK: London Times censors mass opposition to mandatory
Swine Flu vaccine.
Prison Planet 2009 July 16 (Cached)
US: Harley Davidson cuts 1000 jobs as sales plunge.
Economic Times 2009 July 16 (Cached)
US: J.P. Morgan-Chase reports 36% surge in profits
after counting it massive taxpayer bailout. It's easy to show a profit when
you have access to stolen funds. Washington Post 2009
July 16 (Cached)
US: Hillary Clinton says CFR tells government what it
should be doing and how to think about the future. Really! Read the
State Dept 2009 July 15 (Cached)
Great undercover expose of government health care.
Entertaining but pathetically true.
Breitbart 2009 July 15
50 heads of state from developing countries call for
New World Order. (Read: global government based on the model of
collectivism.) In reality, it's already here. They just want it to be more
Raw Story 2009 July 15 (Cached)
Maine: Bangor City Councilor Opposes Public
Involvement in Local Government. Says voters should not have a direct voice
in tax issues. The only thing unusual about her view is that she admits it.
As Maine Goes 2009 July 15 (Cached)
India takes giant step toward New World Order by
issuing 1.2 billion national identity cards. If the cards were stacked, they
would rise 150 times higher than Mt. Everest. Collectivist heaven.
Times Online 2009 July 15 (Cached)
US: Deployment orders are revoked for soldier who
challenged Obama's legitimacy as Commander and Chief. Soldier's attorney
sees that as a victory for those seeking proof of where the
President was born. No long-form birth certificate has yet been produced.
WND 2009 July 14 (Cached)
CBS 60-Minutes program from 1979 exposes the false
Swine Flu pandemic scare and the health disasters that followed mass
inoculations. Looks like history is about to repeat. This is VERY important.
60 Minutes Posted 2009 July 11
Philadelphia talk-show host, well known for his
endorsement of Creature from Jeckyll Island, suffers fatal heart
attack on stage while introducing the book's author, G. Edward Griffin.
Philadelphia Enquirer Posted 2009 July 11 (Cached)
This is what TV ads for anti-depressant drugs SHOULD
be like. CCHR Posted 2009 July 11
US: Widely circulated quote by Judge Sotomayer calling
for castration of white males is a fake, says Snopes. Here is how it
Snopes Posted 2009 July 11 (Cached)
Chicago has its coolest July 8 in 118 years. This is
global warming? Chicago Tribune 2009 July 9 (Cached)
Posted last week with bad link. Now correct.
FROM OUR READERS
Send comments to
Although we are unable to engage in personal correspondence, we deeply
appreciate your contribution. Thank you.
THOUGHTS ON THE SPIRITUAL FOUNDATION OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
Have you done any research regarding the spiritual nature/root at the heart
of so many of the issues we face today? If so, what are your thoughts on the
spiritual background concerning the New World Order? I believe based on the
evidence that it is Luciferian (the light bearer) in nature. Can you comment
on the New World Order, and the New Age (world religion)?
Aaron, 2009 July 17
I see the spiritual component of our global battle to be very important, and
I suspect that there is a strong occult connection, although I don't know
how one could go about proving that to the satisfaction of skeptics. Even
without that, however, I do not think that the resolution of the conflict
for freedom lies solely in theology. Advocates of the The New Order want the
collectivist state to become the operational equivalent and replacement of
all present religions. Loyalty to any other body of ideas is viewed by them
as competition to their absolute rule.
Further than that, you may find my comments on the role of religion in our
freedom crusade to be of interest: (Click
"POWER ATTRACTS CORRUPTION" IS A NEW SLANT ON LORD ACTON'S "POWER
Dear Mr. Griffin:
I spent a day or so going through portions of your Freedom Force website. I
must say that I am in complete agreement with your insight concerning the
use of the name "Protectorate" to describe what our founders had in mind for
the nature of our federal "government". I should add in addition that the
one concept that appeared in your writing that I regarded as something of a
revelation was the notion that a priori corrupt personages would make it
their business to invade public office for the plunder that was there
available, the reverse causation sequence of Lord Acton's much more widely
known "Power Corrupts". I also agree that "Who watches the watchers?" is the
key issue. You have created Freedom Force International to accomplish that
Alan J., 2009 July 16
TEACHER HAS FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUPPRESSION OF QUIGLEY'S BOOK
I'm currently reading your book, Creature of Jekyll Island. I'm a public
high school history/government/economics teacher. I'm considering assigning
your book to my honors students next year (Aug. 09).
On page 213 is a photo of Professor Quigley formerly of Georgetown
University. It mentions that his book, Tragedy and Hope, was
suppressed. I met Professor Quigley in February of 1971 while taking
students to Washington, D.C. for a Close Up Foundation meeting with
government officials. I went to meet Professor Quigley on a Friday afternoon
and found him in his office. We chatted for quite some time. We spoke about
his book being suppressed and he showed me letters from librarians saying
they could not purchase a copy to replace copies stolen from their library.
I was 24 at that time and probably didn't fully understand the implications
of this suppression.
On page 230 of your text, you discuss the ultimate obstacle of the cartel is
government that doesn't want to finance debt; or incur more. It led me to
rethink Eisenhower's warning about the alliance of the military-industrial
complex and Jim Garrison's search for the real assassin in Dallas, 1963. The
first American troops to be removed from Vietnam took place just a few
Great job on this work.
Neil E., 2009 July 16
HOW TO GET GRIFFIN ON MAINSTREAM MEDIA
In reading the many & varied comments & views from our fellow
members/readers, it is clear that the passion & patriotism they convey is
very real. We should all be encouraged by their spirit & enthusiasm and
continue to encourage one another. In one short letter Cindy C asked why our
friend G. Edward Griffin has not yet been interviewed by any of the talking
heads on Fox News. I'm sure many others are asking the same question. This
would indeed be the ideal kind of exposure we need to more effectively get
the word out to the unsuspecting public. However, because the media (which
includes the Fox Network) is owned by the opposition, they are on a short
leash. That is to say O'Reilly, Beck, Hannity & others are only allowed to
broadcast 'censored' news. At a certain point they are not allowed to cross
the line. Notice that when they do get too close to the line, there is
little, or no follow up on the issue, or they conveniently launch into in
commercial break. For example in one Beck episode he said; " the Federal
Reserve was not Federal", but there was little, or no effective follow up
Since Fox favors the Republican wing, may I suggest the following: Lou Dobbs
claims to be an Independent. Independents tend to want facts & solutions to
our nations woes and they number close to one third of the voters, should
they ever choose to vote. If as many serious minded Freedom Force members as
possible were to write to Lou Dobbs about getting Mr. Griffin on his
Network, there is a good chance that some of these letters would get through
the Network screening process and reach Lou. Perhaps this suggestion may
seem somewhat unorthodox, but it is sometimes ' thinking outside the box '
that gets results!
Stan B., 2009 July 16
COMMENT BY ED GRIFFIN:
On Wednesday, July 15, I was interviewed on the Fox channel by Judge Andrew
Napolitano and was about ten minutes to tell it like it really is regarding
the Fed. Napolitano was receptive and seemed to be in strong agreement. It
remains to be seen, of course, if the program producers will schedule follow
WHO KNOWS WHAT ABOUT THE PANDEMIC?
Interested in your judgment as to the level of understanding of the public
(and of your audience, assuming it is more knowledgeable) as to the coming
pandemic (as it is called). How many know that this is a man-made and
man-implemented disease, intended to cause genocide? How many know (or
suspect) that the vaccines are intended to spread the pandemic and will be
the root cause of the severity of the resultant flu? ... and that they are
to be avoided at all costs, as they are dangerous and death-dealing?
When I hear from you, I'll give you my feelings,
Dave L., 2009 July 15
It appears that you already have succinctly expressed your feelings. My
opinion is that subscribers to Unfiltered News and members of Freedom
Force are well aware of the political motivations behind the Swine Flu
so-called pandemic and are very suspicious about the vaccine becoming a
carrier or aggravator of the disease. The general public, however, hasn’t a
clue. They still are living in the “all-is-what-it-seems” twilight zone.
250 "CREATURE" CDS HANDED OUT
We had about 3000 Patriots attend out July 4th event in Peachtree City, GA.
I copied over 250 of your CD’s “The Creature from Jekyll Island” and handed
out as people signed our petition. We also had petition tables to audit the
Federal Reserve, a petition to stop Obama’s Health Care, and a petition to
stop Cap and Trade. Thank you for this idea of yours to share and educate
the public about the “real” agenda of the so-called Federal Reserve.
Blessings to you!!
Gayle Braun, 2009 July 14
PREDICTIONS IN "CREATURE" CONTINUE TO AMAZE
Dear Mr. Griffin,
Ever since reading your treatise on the Federal Reserve, I have been so
moved that I have purchased over a dozen copies to share with friends. After
pointing out the original date of publication, I have suggested to all of my
friends that they start reading their books at Chapter 24 (which could
easily have been culled from the pages of 2008 editions of the Wall
Street Journal) and then go back and start at the beginning to see how
we got here.
Anyhow, because of the insights that I've gleaned from your research and
writing, I have developed a keen eye for stories that demonstrate evidence
of the further progression towards the goals of the elite. So, imagine my
surprise when I read the story today about a Federal program that could be
described as a significant step towards the nationalization of the housing
industry and the gradual elimination of personal property. And the amazing
thing is that it is positioned as a convenient way for "troubled homeowners"
to "save their homes" from foreclosure! This is the one prediction that you
had made which I really had some trouble envisioning! So, your
prognostications continue to amaze me.
Thank you and God bless you for your contributions to my knowledge and
John B, 2009 July 14
A CONSTITUTIONAL MILITIA WOULD BE THE BACKBONE OF A PROTECTORATE
I really found this to be a fascinating read. I just have one thing I'm
curious about though, why did you not go into the topic of "The Militia of
The Several States"? The true constitutional militia. It would lower taxes
dramatically because "We The People" would be the ones taking care of most
of the basic functions that people are paid to do as government employee's.
We would need no FEMA or similar high dollar organizations. We would not
have to worry about disarmament or confiscation of property because we
ourselves would be the protectorate. We would be more informed on things
going on because we would be more involved, ballots could be counted and
double counted by the militia. Every home with an able bodied male would be
able to vote more effectively. Due to the difference in needs, technology,
population, etc. of historical U.S. militias, not everyone would constantly
be busy working with the militia so, things in our day to day engagements
would be normal. They would be similar to the reserves in the sense that
they would go for training periodically. When under emergency alarm then all
would muster. Just as traditional gun control would have it everyone would
be required to have their own firearm to have at home as well as other
pertinent tools to the individuals functions in the militia, And much much
much more. Thank you for you time as always.
Chuan Bo, 2009July 14
A GOVERNMENT IS A GOVERNMENT - NOT
Comment by G. Edward Griffin, 2009 July 13
Last week I published an analysis of Statism Is Dead, a video
advocating a form of anarchy called Anarcho Capitalism as a desirable
alternative for government. In my response I offered an entirely new
alternative called a protectorate, a political structure in which the state
would be prohibited from doing anything except to protect the lives,
liberty, and property of its citizens.
When this concept was first presented to a Libertarian friend, he objected
that, as long as the state has the authority to use coercion against people,
it is still a government, even though it may be restricted to a defensive
role. He wrote: "A government is a government. Even 'anarcho-capitalist
Protection Agencies' are governments! ... If they are to pursue justice,
they are still obliged to initiate force against suspects, even if they
My friend was focused on the old vocabulary and had not yet opened his mind
to the possibility of a genuine new entry into the political lexicon. What I
am presenting is not just a re-hash of the old concept in which talk about
"limited government" is expressed in terms of quantity (how much
government), instead of purpose (what shall government do). With the old
concept, he would be right: government is government. A lot or a little, it
always suffers from mission creep and will eventually become tyrannical.
However, if it is limited to a negative, defensive function, then there is
little room for mission creep because there is no possibility for legalized
plunder, which is the primary incentive for expanding government in the
An aircraft with no wings or tail, that cannot fly but is limited solely to
ground travel is not an aircraft any longer. It is an automobile. If a truck
is deprived of its steering ability, and its rubber tires are replaced by
steel flanges that run on rails, it is no longer a truck. It is a train.
Likewise, a state that has been deprived of its authority to use coercion
for any purpose except the protection the life, liberty, and property of its
citizens, cannot be classified as a government. It is a protectorate.
If we and our neighbors hire a security guard to patrol our neighborhood,
and if we authorize him to use force against intruders for the restricted
purpose of protecting our lives, liberty, and property (each of us has that
right of self defense, so we can delegate it to the guard), that does not
give him the authority to govern us - with the obvious narrow exception of
insuring that we, ourselves, do not threaten our neighbors. When our
contract with guards or state administrators is strictly for our defense, we
do not create a government. It is a protectorate.
This is not a new concept in political literature but, in this context, it
is a new word. It is far overdue because, without it, it has been
impossible to even talk about the negative concept of the state without
resorting to long and cumbersome sentences of explanation. At last we have
the right word.
If you would like to see the original analysis, updated with this additional
NOT FIGHTING CITY HALL, BECOMING CITY HALL
Hello, Mr. Griffin.
I so enjoyed your speech at Eastern University. Once again, it is because of
you that I am involved in the Freedom Movement and threw my hat in the
political ring. I can't thank you enough for educating me. And you're
correct in that the missing piece to the puzzle is that we need to get
involved ourselves: "An Idea Whose Time Has Come."
I spoke with you a little about my being elected to the Republican Party
State Committee and what we (Rob Eichmann, Jr. and I) have been trying to do
in New Jersey. We represent the Republican Party from Gloucester County. ...
Rob and I feel that the Republican Party in New Jersey has lost its
identity, and many of the candidates endorsed by the Republican Party are no
different than democrats. I understand the reason for having identical, yet
what appears to be different, political parties ("Tragedy and Hope" written
by Professor Carroll Quigley). Here is a chance for two of us to help make a
difference in our state.
What is happening in the moderate State of New Jersey is that followers of
Robert Welch, G Edward Griffin and Ron Paul are making inroads in the
political arena. I suspect it will get ugly for awhile, and then we can "get
back to our roots" and once again follow the U.S. Constitution. That is what
I hope will happen in New Jersey. I am sending this information to you
because I thought you may be interested in what is taking place in New
Besides Rob Eichmann, Jr. and I being elected to a four-year term as State
Committee members, we also have a candidate for sheriff and a candidate for
County Freeholder, and I am again a candidate for Township Committee. The
information you share with us is having a ripple effect. I thought you might
get a kick out of hearing how you have affected some of us and how we are
helping to implement change in our small part of the world.
Thank you again, Mr. Griffin, for your words of wisdom and guidance. .
Donna Ward, 2009 July 12
SO THE SUPREME COURT SAYS WE CAN'T SECEDE
I have come to the conclusion the the Court is second only to Congress in
the number of lies told to the people of The United States and second to
none in the destruction of this great Republic. As anyone who has spent any
time at all in a study of the Constitution knows, this so-called decision is
an absolute contradiction of the Constitution, not to mention a repudiation
of the Declaration of Independence.
Mr G, the frustration you have had to deal with trying to get the truth out
must at times be almost too much to bear.
William V Wood Tsgt USAF (Ret), 2009 July 11
REPLY FROM EG: Yup!
KEMAL RESPONDS TO PETERSON
On the same newsletter, in which you responded to me, a gentlemen by the
name of "Stan" wrote a comment that the "Owner of Fox News is member of CFR/Trilateral
Commission." Here is what he wrote in dicta:
"Opinions are usually based on observation and shared observations with like
minded people usually tend to lend more credibility to the issues in
question. Facts are another matter. First, we need to establish what facts
pertaining to what issues. Then, where can these facts be found? And how do
we gain access to these facts? Further questions arise as to the credibility
& source of these facts, who documented & compiled the data? How can they be
satisfactorily verified? One can easily begin to understand that providing
PROOF about the status & background of any given personality is a daunting
Obviously I am not the only one thinking like this. So too does Stan. Your
response shows nothing factual, other than reaching hyped-up personal
conclusions that are just opinions. Why can you not "establish what [are
the] facts?". Your ad hominem attacks saying that I am "delusion" and that I
have "embarassed" myself are just an unfair way of you, not answering the
challenge. You then say that I would "believe corporate media actors to
deliver" me news. I do submit to you that, by personally being subscribed to
the Unfiltered News, do you really have the nerve to say that?
Offer me something from a primary source that shows that Glenn Beck is what
you claim him to be, rather than offering me what your brain antenna recept.
This is what needs to change in this movement! Establish facts and not offer
more opinions, which is something we have enough of in this movement. Just
because he cried once on his show - is irrebutable proof that he is part of
an operative group? That's just hogwash!
I am not ignoring reality here, I am just questioning your observations. I
certainly do not question your sincerity, but I am just trying to show you,
as well as others, a growing cancer that needs to be fixed within this
movement and that is FACT CHECKING. And finally, going to your poor example
of Michael Jackson. I am no fan of Michael Jackson, but to give you a legal
answer, he was acquited by a jury of his peers, when his "lunacy" was placed
on trial before a jury.
Who knows - now that I a disagree with you, I too, would be labeled a CIA
operative in your mind, merely because I disagree and challenge your
Kemal Kurtulus, 2009 July 11
LARRY RESPONDS TO KAMAL
GLEN BECK LIKES THE CFR
I don't know what this discussion is about, and I agree with you 1000% that
personal opinions mean little. But, I would like to offer the following
about Glenn Beck.
I attended the OKC Tea Party on 4-15. That afternoon, I started back home
and my route was east on I-40. I was about an hour out from Ft.
Smith, AR, and was channel surfing on the radio looking for a talk show,
when I found a station with a Beck program. I heard him say on that day as
follows: that the CFR and Tri-Lat Comm were only concerned for the
well-being of the American people, were friends of the American people, and
only wanted to help improve their lives. Based on what I have learned about
these organizations, what Beck said was false. I now consider Beck to be in
the enemy's camp.
I only know what I heard. I cannot produce that radio program, and proving
what I heard can only come from Beck's lips if he says it again, and perhaps
writes such in a letter. But, I am no fan of Beck, and believe he has
Larry Becraft, 2009 July 11
GRIFFIN MEETS MOLYNEUX!
Ed Griffin meets Stefan Molyneux in this wonderful dialogue; I am very glad
that these issues are being brought up to the Freedom Force
membership [and readers of Unfiltered News]. Here are some questions that
Is a man's right in his property truly, incontrovertibly, an inalienable
If some elites succeed in forming a political government that claims
sovereignty over my property, against my wishes, and issues rules in
conflict with my own rules, whose rules take precedence? Would the
proposed "protectorate" leave me alone if I asserted sovereignty over my own
property and ignored the various rules it emits and fees it levies?
Furthermore, I am told that my final recourse to rejecting the
legitimate sovereignty of an organization that would murder me if I
resist its robbery is to leave my homestead behind and find another
place to live. (Even the proposed "protectorate" would have to be
tax-funded, if it is to be a monopoly provider of political liberty in
the sense of "limited government".)
Assume that I were to resign myself to this apparent contradiction to
the notion of inalienable property rights -- though it is unclear why
"keeping my property" and "being left alone" must be mutually exclusive.
Then what if there is nowhere more free for me to go? What if every
other State has closed its borders to people like me -- for example,
through international agreements not to harbor "tax evaders" or
Why should my only options be to "find the door" -- assuming a way out still
remains -- or to "stay and fight", with the inescapable
consequences of taking on an entire gang dedicated to preserving the
appearance of omnipotence?
Isn't there a third option: that the legitimacy of government, or of any
other association, is fundamentally defined by whether it is required to
leave alone those who object to it?
This idea of a "protectorate" is not a new idea at all as long as I am
forced to pay it and forced to accept its services on its terms if I
want to keep my property. These two seemingly innocuous powers are all any
government needs to grow from the smallest "protectorate" seed to the most
Paper constitutions have the same long-term value as paper money; also, like
paper money, they lend a false sense of security to the holder. What
constitution has ever kept the government from rewriting or discarding it
throughout history? Just look at Latin America and Europe: one could make a
bonfire with the constitutions they have gone through in the last 500 years.
Every communist regime in Africa shrouds itself both with monetary and with
But the heart of the matter is this: Concentrated power that legalizes
robbery to fund itself will always win in the end. It always wins
because the State steals from those who work, so that State-connected
interests do not need to work to put food on the table, and can thus occupy
their days working to consolidate their power. The consolidated power is
eventually turned on those whom the original, limited power was intended to
serve. And because the victims have to work for a living, they do not have
the means of fighting back.
We know that this power cartel won't let anything as quaint as a set of
written rules stand in its way. So do we really want to be advocating aiding
and abetting something that will become the worst nightmare of generations
down the road?
Imagine how the Founders, with the exception of Alexander Hamilton, would
react if they were to observe what their little experiment mutated into,
despite the efforts of probably the finest team of governmental engineers in
history. Had they foreseen what would become of the U.S. government, I
believe the convention in Philadelphia would have been called off.
We are enlightened beyond any generation that came before. Let's use our
unique perspective to try new ways of doing things, instead of
staying on the same old treadmill. Disagree? Fine. I just hope you'll
leave me alone to do things my way on my own property; that's all I ask.
Is that "anarchy"? I believe it is nothing more than the most
fundamental of all liberties: the right to freely disassociate.
Ryan, 2009 July 11
LOYALTY CANNOT BE COMPELLED
A rather whimsical ruling by the Supreme Court; nothing in the Constitution
prohibits any state, or group of states, from exiting the union, which was a
critical issue for Abraham Lincoln. ... The federal government was not given
the power in the Constitution to retain states which wish to leave, but the
ability for states to leave, if they wish, is at least implied by the Tenth
Amendment; while I've not read the brief as yet, my money says that Texas
did not rely upon the Tenth Amendment in its secession. The forced retention
of secessionist states by force or decree is ludicrous, since compelled
loyalty is a false loyalty upon its face.
Ken Case, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2009 July 11
ABOUT THE INDICTMENT OF THE BROWNS
I appreciate all the alternative news you present in your 'Reality Zone' e-zine.
Although I don't subscribe to any of the mass propaganda resources, this is
the only news I read regularly. I read the Brown's conviction article with
interest. There are a number of points in the article that are notable:
1. The Browns live in NH, the only state where there didn't used to be gun
regulations. Yet, they had their 2nd Amendment guarantees entirely violated
by an 'out of control' federal government, assisted by the COUNTY SHERIFF
(who was traditionally supposed to be 'the law of the land', as well as
their last line of defense against government corruption).
2. The sneaky tactics utilized by the federal government to 'peacefully'
take them into custody were reprehensible. I suppose they would have lost
their aura of legitimacy had they initiated another Waco.
3. They had no organized help from their neighbors: "United we stand,
divided we fall".
4. The federal prosecutor debased them in the media with a post-trial
comment to the effect that the feds were 'upholding the rule of law'. Had
the feds been doing such, they would never have approached the Browns for
anything, whether tax-related or firearms-related. Does the news ever
present the BILLIONS of $ of ANNUALLY UNPAID tax revenues that their own
people NEVER pay, but are LEGALLY REQUIRED to pay? We do not, b/c these
'public spectacles' are designed by the police state to intimidate the
people and control them through their minds by fear, while keeping them
ignorant and divided. The feds were clearly in violation of THEIR OWN tax
laws and THEIR OWN OATHS OF OFFICE regarding the 2nd Amendment. So were all
the other 'legal officials' involved in this travesty of 'law and order'.
How can that be right?
5. All of the news articles about the Browns have been severely biased in
favor of the federal tyranny, presenting the feds as being legitimate and
'law-upholding'; when in fact the federal tyranny is LAWLESS. They break the
letter of the law and violate our rights B/C THEY CAN, not b/c it's right.
WHO is there to hold them to account for all their policy-driven
lawlessness? Surely not a divided American public. I have personal knowledge
of the facts on how brainwashed the federal employees and officers are. I
wonder why they aren't held to the same standards of 'knowledge' and
'behavior' as the courts hold 'the people' to?
6. I attempted to contact the author of the article (David Tirrell-Wysocki),
but have been unable to find any contact information on the internet. It
seems good to me to contact the journalist who wrote the article, and then
question them directly, instead of leaving comments in an online blog. I
wish to inquire why they ALWAYS presnt PARTIAL facts in a BIASED manner,
without ANY regard for the LAW and the RIGHTS of the people. Instead, they
spin government allegiance instead of allegiance to GOD, the Creator of all
our rights and of law and order. I wonder why I can hardly ever contact
these writers; and when I do, they ALWAYS refuse to answer the 'hard
Thanks again for spreading around alternative news, much of which would
never make the main media channels.
Chris Huminski, 2009 July 11
YOU HAVE AGREED TO A SOCIAL CONTRACT IF YOU...
Aloha Mr. Griffin,
I appreciate your newsletter and especially your thoughtful commentary. I
write to you today in response to John Ferguson's response to your critique
of Stefan Molyneux's Statism is Dead video series.
I would encourage Mr. Ferguson to continue studying these issues and would
highly recommend the philosophers mentioned in this article on the social
To give a complete response would likely take hours to complete and so I
intend here to cover the basics. So my focus will only on the question of
whether or not Mr. Ferguson signed a "Social Contract." I would contend that
he did and is not even aware of it.
I would like to ask Mr. Ferguson a few questions:
Does he have a Social Security Card?
Does he have any bank accounts, credit cards, mortgages, etc.?
Does he have a State issued Driver's License? Registration?
Does he maintain any professional licenses with his state?
Does he have a voter registration filed in his state?
Does he use Federal Reserve Notes in the conduct of his trade or business?
Is he a United States Citizen?
This last one is a "gimme"... if he has answered yes to the other questions
he is a de-facto citizen of the United States. If Mr. Ferguson, or anyone
else, for that matter, has answered "yes" to each of these questions than he
has signed the Social Contract with the United States Government.
Mike Flaherty, 2009 July 11
Being informed is not enough.
Freedom Force awaits you here.
THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND; A SECOND LOOK AT THE FEDERAL RESERVE
by G. Edward Griffin
does money come from? Where does it go? Who makes it? The money magician's
secrets are unveiled. Here is a close look at their mirrors and smoke
machines, the pulleys, cogs, and wheels that create the grand illusion
called money. A boring subject? Just wait. You'll be hooked in five minutes.
It reads like a detective story – which it really is, but it's all true.
This book is about the most blatant scam of history. (More)
The Richardson Cancer Clinic Experience,
by J.A. Richardson & Patricia Griffin.
62 case histories proving beyond any doubt that Laetrile (Vitamin B17) works
in the control of cancer. These are not anecdotal stories or cases of people
who never had cancer in the first place. Each history is authenticated by a
firm diagnosis and meticulous medical documentation.
This edition includes a follow up 30 years after the patients were diagnosed
with incurable cancer. Proof is in the actual life-span of these people who,
previously, had been told by their doctors that they had just a few months
or weeks to live.
Europe & U.S. indexes, today
S&P 500, 5 yrs. Click for price.
5 yrs. Click for price.
5 yrs. Click for price.
The Story of Vitamin B17
by G. Edward Griffin.
Mr. Griffin marshals the evidence that cancer is a deficiency disease—like
scurvy or pellagra—aggravated by the lack of an essential food compound in
modern man’s diet. That substance is vitamin B17. In its purified form
developed for cancer therapy, it is known as Laetrile. This story is not
approved by orthodox medicine. The FDA, the AMA, and The American Cancer
Society have labeled it fraud and quackery. Yet the evidence is clear that
here, at last, is the final answer to the cancer riddle. Why has orthodox
medicine waged war against this non drug approach? The author contends that
the answer is to be found, not in science, but in politics—and is based upon
the hidden economic and power agenda of those who dominate the medical
establishment. This is is the most complete and authoritative treatise
available on this topic. (More)
MAKING A KILLING: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging
documentary exposes how psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry have
invented so-called mental diseases that are merely conditions of normal
human experience – such as shyness or anxiety. Their goal is to convince
everyone they have a mental condition that must be managed by prescription
drugs. This marketing ploy has led half the population into dependency on
medications for the rest of their lives. People are harmed more than helped,
and these drugs kill an estimated 42,000 people every year. Learn how to
protect your family from this brutal money-making machine. (More)
GENERATION RX; Children As Victims of Anti-Depressant Drugs
Follows the trail of dishonest advertising,
research, deceived doctors, corrupt corporate executives, distraught
parents, and drugged children – a trail that leads to a wave of youth
aggression and suicides. Millions of young people have been falsely
diagnosed as having a brain chemical imbalance and given anti-depressant
drugs that are destroying their minds. Even the most informed person will be
shocked by the facts and testimony in this documentary. The human race
depends on exposing and then stopping this pseudo-science of death. (More)
KATANGA; THE UNTOLD STORY OF U.N. BETRAYAL
tells how the U. N., from 1960 to 1962, waged an unprovoked war against the
peaceful state of Katanga and forced it under the Communist state of the
Central Congo. Top U.N. personnel boasted in their public speeches and
memoirs of how they pretended to be preserving law and order while actually
carrying out a military operation to crush the tiny nation, all in the name
of peace. We have not seen the last of U.N. so-called peace-keeping forces.
Unless the further development of what is called the New World Order can be
stopped, we are going to see a U.N. army used more and more to bring its
peculiar brand of peace to the world. The best way to envision the future is
to know the past. Black-and-white. 1991 introduction by
G. Edward Griffin. Originally released as a VHS tape, this program has been
re-mastered in DVD format. (More)
UNSTOPPABLE GLOBAL WARMING (EVERY 1500 YEARS)
This New York Times Best Seller is a data mine of scientific facts showing
that global warming is not caused by human activity but by solar activity
and cosmic radiation – and the cycle has been occurring for millions of
years. The recent rise in temperature has created the most ideal climate for
civilization that Earth has ever experienced. The next cycle will be colder
and much less beneficial for mankind.
GREAT GLOBAL WARMING SWINDLE
First broadcast over Great Britain’s public service TV station, this
documentary deconstructs the myth that Global Warming is caused by human
activity. World-class scientists explain that it is caused by solar
activity, and that similar cycles have occurred many times in history. Solar
activity recently was high, so higher temperatures are the expected result.
In previous years, when industrialization was increasing at its greatest
rate, temperatures went down. (More)
THE FEDERAL RESERVE
A Discourse by G. Edward Griffin
author of The Creature from Jekyll Island; A Second Look at the Federal
Reserve adresses such issues as: Who created the Fed? How is money
What impact has this had on the American Dollar? Should our currency be
backed by gold or silver? Where does government get most of its funding? Why
do bankers get away with it? What might happen if we continue on our current
path? What might come from a return to constitutional money? (More)
OF ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION
This is a history of theories and experiments regarding antigravity travel.
It is a virtual encyclopedia of data, blueprints, and photographs. Includes
information on electrogravitic effects now used in advanced military craft,
such as the B-2 bomber, and in missiles. Everyone with an interest in the
science of harnessing gravity should have this book for the sheer enjoyment
of the unfolding story and as a serious reference volume.
THE DANGEROUS SERVANT;
A Discourse on Government by
G. Edward Griffin
is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is force. Like fire, a
dangerous servant and a fearful master.” – George Washington
G. Edward Griffin responds to questions from a camera crew creating a video
documentary on the U.S. Constitution. He answers the most difficult
questions imaginable in the fields of political and social science. The
depth and clarity is amazing, especially considering he is speaking
without script or notes. In an era when many people are
just now waking up to the WHAT of current events, here are issues for the
brain that go far beyond that shallow pool into the deep water of WHY and
DECEPTION WAS MY JOB
The Testimony of Yuri Bezmenov, KGB Propagandist
Bezmenov, the son of a high-ranking Soviet officer, was a member of the
elite propaganda arm of the KGB, known as the Novasti Press Agency. One of
his assignments was to accompany journalists visiting the Soviet Union to
make sure they did not discover the truth about Soviet life. After becoming
disillusioned with the oppressive system, he escaped to the West at great
risk to his life. In this interview, conducted by G. Edward Griffin, Mr.
Bezmenov tells how the Soviets used propaganda against their own citizens;
how he hoodwinked American journalists into publishing Soviet propaganda,
how slave laborers are concealed from foreign visitors, and how he escaped
to the West posing as an American hippie. Includes many photographs brought
with him on microfilm at the time of his escape.
Part 1: Life under Soviet Collectivism
Part 2: Propaganda and Mind Control
Part 3: Cultural Subversion and Escape
A Temptation for Electronic Vote Fraud.
Governments are installing
computerized voting systems with no paper record
to verify accuracy. Elections will be controlled by companies that do not
allow voters to inspect their software. If vote counting becomes privatized,
there may be no way to get it back. High-tech vote fraud is already a
reality. If you value your vote, you absolutely must get this information to
your friends – and fast! (More)
THE POLITICALLY INCORRECT GUIDE TO GLOBAL WARMING AND ENVIRONMENTALISM
is scientific proof that: the Earth often has been hotter than it is now;
only a tiny portion of green-house gases are man-made; most of Antarctica
now is getting colder; the media only recently abandoned the global
"cooling” scare; and more. These facts counter the global-warming junk
science that is scaring people into meekly accepting more government. (More)
TORTURED IN RED CHINA
The Persecution of Falun Gong
The Testimony of Charles Lee
Charles Lee is one of the few political prisoners held in Chinese prisons
who has survived to tell about it. After receiving a medical degree in
China, he came to the U.S. in 1991 for graduate study and soon thereafter
became an American citizen. In 2003 he returned to China to proclaim the
truth about government persecution of Falun Gong, a non-violent, spiritual
movement dedicated to “Truthfulness, Compassion and Forbearance”. He was
arrested and sentenced to 3 years in prison where he was beaten, force-fed,
and tortured, which he describes in gruesome detail in this video interview
by G. Edward Griffin. On January 21, 2006, Charles was released and returned
to San Francisco. Now he is a leader in the movement that has motivated
millions of members of the Chinese Communist Party to resign. (More)
FIAT EMPIRE; The Federal Reserve vs. The Constitution
documentary shows how the Federal Reserve creates inflation, destabilizes
the economy, causes wars, and enriches financial elitists at the expense of
the common man. You will learn that the Fed is not a government agency but a
banking cartel, and you will understand why many Americans view it as a
sophisticated form of organized crime. (More)
Clicking on any of the
will take you to the
An alphabetical listing and brief description of
all items in our catalog.
New items from
all categories, of special interest to returning customers.
Books and recordings on
the war against freedom, privacy, and sovereignty.
Books and recordings on
medical fraud & natural health (without drugs).
How to protect
yourself from the economic & political power of corrupt banks.
recordings on many other interesting topics.
all categories are listed here in the order of popularity.
Dynamic CDs on freedom, monetary, and health issues, and true-life
Rock-bottom prices and special offers.